11-07-2023, 07:07 PM
in my own experience the main discrepancy lies in peoples' understanding of the quality of their own application and work in relation to the request being made by it, i do my best to issue explanations on denials/unsatisfactory results in apps, but i don't always have the time to when processing 10+ applications at once.
being more critical and indicative of points to improve/work on in denials is something to work on in general.
i would be the first to say that the culture of app responses has changed a lot over the course of e4, particularly recently i think the team has been working on being more stringent with signatures as they are certainly not intended for everyone to have and run around with, but also the inflation of item stats which occurred for a while.
the austerity around sig approvals and item stat allocation is mainly coming from a place of trying to curtail run-away and ridiculous items/sigs which may not have have a beneficial impact on story-telling.
ofc not everyone on the app team may feel the same way but these are my thoughts
being more critical and indicative of points to improve/work on in denials is something to work on in general.
i would be the first to say that the culture of app responses has changed a lot over the course of e4, particularly recently i think the team has been working on being more stringent with signatures as they are certainly not intended for everyone to have and run around with, but also the inflation of item stats which occurred for a while.
the austerity around sig approvals and item stat allocation is mainly coming from a place of trying to curtail run-away and ridiculous items/sigs which may not have have a beneficial impact on story-telling.
ofc not everyone on the app team may feel the same way but these are my thoughts