07-26-2021, 07:00 PM
So, let's be honest. We're all staring at the argument in the discussion channel right now. A lot of questions are being asked.
What constitutes valid reasoning?
And my proposal is, quite bluntly, to make it no matter anymore. It's obvious that there's always going to be conflict in terms of what counts and what doesn't, and truth be told, the lines are blurry.
Get rid of the "(if they don't have a valid reason)" specification on 2v1s in settlements. It does not need to be there.
What constitutes valid reasoning?
And my proposal is, quite bluntly, to make it no matter anymore. It's obvious that there's always going to be conflict in terms of what counts and what doesn't, and truth be told, the lines are blurry.
Get rid of the "(if they don't have a valid reason)" specification on 2v1s in settlements. It does not need to be there.
![[Image: unknown.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/803879107032252456/839996626117853204/unknown.png)
thank you dandeli