Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Danger Setting
#18
i'm torn! i really am! on instinct i downvoted when i read the post! i will fully admit that, i have removed said downvote because it just got me thinking is all.

i don't like the idea of first encounters having a cap. that's just me! but..

let's take an example of! A big bad of 220 RPL is in their home city, and some baby spawns in and IMMEDIATELY starts shit talking them. over and over again. they shouldn't be defended by the 0 cap restraint rule regardless of RPL. because that's just

it's stupid? there's leniency then there's

'i have now warned you 50+ times not to talk mad smack icly. like 50+ times. and you're still doing it."

i am someone that prefers 0 cap dangers-aggressive till there's proper buildup. but i also understand that there are people who will.. roleplay some.. uhm. really dumb ideas that destroy any sense of the scene, break immersion, and makes me go "well they only did that cause they know they can get away with a 0 cap."

but i honestly do like the idea of danger cap having to be 1s. aggressives less so since aggressives feel more like 'im going to teach this punk a lesson'. i also like ryo's idea of making injuries actually more PAINFUL. temp ones specifically, since they can just be healed away by medic in a snap of the finger! there are TONS of medics out there. TONS.

i guess i also think aggressives should ALWAYS 100% temp injure the loser. because that's what aggressive feels like. it feels like someone going "Alright. I don't want to kill/cap you. But you've gotten on my nerves and I need to put you in your place." sort of vibe for me. barring situations where the RPL gap is just way too much but yeah.
I swear I'm not...
[Image: 6d7a3f4d84055aacec42e9e916296a47.png]
[Image: f6b263cfa536c446e088c6c6a5d319e7.png]
I'm not owned guys.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Danger Setting - by TheHopscotch - 01-17-2021, 01:33 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Milly - 01-17-2021, 01:36 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Teemo - 01-17-2021, 01:36 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Nailman - 01-17-2021, 01:36 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Jumpy - 01-17-2021, 01:37 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by TheHopscotch - 01-17-2021, 01:43 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Avee - 01-17-2021, 02:17 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Avee - 01-17-2021, 01:39 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Sanguine415 - 01-17-2021, 01:48 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Sandshark - 01-17-2021, 01:49 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by SleepyDemon - 01-17-2021, 01:53 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by InThePooPoo - 01-17-2021, 02:03 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by ry0un0suke - 01-17-2021, 02:04 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Dreamspeaker - 01-17-2021, 02:18 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Milly - 01-17-2021, 02:10 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Sandshark - 01-17-2021, 02:18 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Milly - 01-17-2021, 02:22 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by ~Aoria-sama~ - 01-17-2021, 02:14 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by SilkiyTea - 01-17-2021, 02:21 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Nailman - 01-17-2021, 02:26 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Chance - 01-17-2021, 02:41 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by SilkiyTea - 01-17-2021, 02:44 AM
RE: The Danger Setting - by Oyster. - 01-17-2021, 04:15 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)