12-14-2019, 10:35 AM
This is just my own opinion as an Unarmed user but...
I do agree that it should gain its GCDE on -most- techniques that received it back, at the cost of potentially lowered damage or increased CDs to make chaining techniques into combinations ending up in a dry spell of sorts. In my opinion, Unarmed's theme was its ability to chain techniques seamlessly into combos.
What I do believe is fine to remain GCD, however, is Lariat while keeping its damage, CD and range. In essence, Lariat already feels like a powerful battle-changing spell if you land it.
-ALTERNATIVELY-.
I don't know if it's viable but if the main problem with Unarmed Tree is the fact that people tie it in with dangerous spell trees, then it could have its GCDE restricted only on Unarmed Spells. In essence, you can then chain Unarmed Spells with one another but not Unarmed into other Spells. Just my two cents on the matter.
I do agree that it should gain its GCDE on -most- techniques that received it back, at the cost of potentially lowered damage or increased CDs to make chaining techniques into combinations ending up in a dry spell of sorts. In my opinion, Unarmed's theme was its ability to chain techniques seamlessly into combos.
What I do believe is fine to remain GCD, however, is Lariat while keeping its damage, CD and range. In essence, Lariat already feels like a powerful battle-changing spell if you land it.
-ALTERNATIVELY-.
I don't know if it's viable but if the main problem with Unarmed Tree is the fact that people tie it in with dangerous spell trees, then it could have its GCDE restricted only on Unarmed Spells. In essence, you can then chain Unarmed Spells with one another but not Unarmed into other Spells. Just my two cents on the matter.